[SOLVED] ECON7520_SAME_1 Chapter 19 International Monetary System P0

100.00 $

Category:
Click Category Button to View Your Next Assignment | Homework

You will receive the following solution file(s) instantly after successful payment:

zip file icon ECON7520-veme1t.zip (2962 KB)
Assignment Instructions Updated Recently? Submit Below and we will provide new Solution!
Submit New Instructions
πŸ”’ Securely Powered by:
Secure Checkout
5/5 - (2 votes)

Chapter 19

International Monetary System
: An Historical Overview Add
(1 of 3)
19.1 Explain how the goals of internal and external balance motivate economic policy makers in open economies.

19.2 Understand the monetary trilemma that policy makers in open economies inevitably face and how alternative international monetary systems address the trilemma in different ways.
Add
(2 of 3)
Learning Objectives
19.3 Describe the structure of the international gold standard that linked countries’ exchange rates and
policies prior
to World War I and the role of the Great Depression of the 1930s in ending efforts to restore the pre-1914 world monetary order.
19.4 Discuss how the post–World WarAdd II Bretton Woods system of globally fixed exchange rates was designed to combine exchange rate stability with limited autonomy of
national macroeconomic policies.
(3 of 3)
19.5 Explain how the Bretton Woods system collapsed in 1973 and why many economists at the time favored an international financial system such as the current one based on floating dollar exchange rates.
Learning Objectives
19.6 Summarize how the monetary and fiscal policies of a large country such as the United States are transmitted abroad under floating exchange rates.Add
19.7 Discuss how the world economy has performed in recent years and what lessons the post-1973 experience teaches about the need for international policy coordination.

Preview (1 of 2)
β€’ Goals of macroeconomic policiesβ€”internal and external balance

β€’ Gold standard era 1870–1914
β€’ International monetary system during interwar period
1918–1939
β€’ Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates 1944–1973Add
Preview (2 of 2)
β€’ Collapse of the Bretton Woods system
β€’ Arguments for floating exchange rates
β€’ Macroeconomic interdependence under a floating

exchange rate
β€’ Foreign exchange markets since 1973
Add (1 of 3)
β€’ Internal balance describes the macroeconomic goals of producing at potential output (at β€œfull employment”) and of price stability (low inflation).
– An unsustainable use of resources (overemployment) tends to increase prices; an ineffective use of resources (underemployment) tends to decrease prices.
β€’ Volatile aggregate demand and output tend to create Add volatile prices.
– Price-level movements reduce economy’s efficiency by making the real value of the monetary unit less certain and thus a less useful guide for economic decisions.
(2 of 3)
β–ͺ For example, pressure on Japan in the 1980s and China in the 2000s.Add
β€’ An intertemporal budget constraint limits each country’s spending over time to levels that it can repay (with interest).
(3 of 3)
β€’ Such an event is called a sudden stop in foreign lending.
Can A Country Borrow Forever? The Case of New Zealand
β€’ New Zealand has run current account deficits every year for as far back as official statistics have been recorded.
β€’ Lenders continue to extend credit and do not seem worried about whether they will be repaid. β€’ Appears that a country can borrow year after year without going broke, as long as does not borrow too much. Add
β€’ By holding net exports to GDP constant at the right value, a country (like New Zealand) with initial net foreign debt will perpetually run deficits in its current account while still maintaining a constant ratio of net foreign liabilities to national output.

New Zealand’s Net Exports, Current Account, and Net

New Zealand has consistently had a current account deficit for decades, yet its net foreign liabilities have averaged about 70 percent of GDP and have been falling in recent years. Source: Statistics New Zealand.
The Open-Economy Trilemma (1 of 2)
β€’ A country that fixes its currency’s exchange rate while allowing free international capital movements gives up control over domestic monetary policy. β€’ A country that fixes its exchange rate can have control over domestic monetary policy if it restricts international
financial flows so that interest parity R R * need not hold.
Add
β€’ Or a country can allow international capital to flow freely and have control over domestic monetary policy if it allows the exchange rate to float.
The Open-Economy Trilemma (2 of 2)
β€’ Impossible for a country to achieve more than two items from the following list:

1. Exchange rate stability.
2. Monetary policy oriented toward domestic goals. 3. Freedom of international capital movements.
Add Figure 19.1 The Monetary Trilemma for Open
Economies

The vertices of the triangle show three features that policy makers in open economies would prefer their monetary system to achieve. Unfortunately, at most two can coexist. Each of the three policy regime labels along the triangle’s edges (floating exchange rate, fixed exchange rate, financial controls) is consistent with the two goals that it lies between in the diagram.
Macroeconomic Policy under the Gold Standard 1870–1914
β€’ The gold standard from 1870 to 1914 and after 1918 had mechanisms that prevented flows of gold reserves (the balance of payments) from becoming too positive or too negative.
– Prices tended to adjust according the amount of gold circulating in an economy, which had effects on the flows of goods and services: the current account.Add
– Central banks influenced financial asset flows, so that the non-reserve part of the financial account matched the current account in order to reduce gold outflows or inflows.
(1 of 5)
β€’ Price-specie-flow mechanism is the adjustment of prices as gold (β€œspecie”) flows into or out of a country, causing an adjustment in the flow of goods.
– An inflow of gold tends to inflate prices. – An outflow of gold tends to deflate prices.
– If a domestic country has a current account surplus in excess of the non-reserve financial account, gold earned from exports flows into the countryβ€”raising prices in that country and Add lowering prices in foreign countries.
β–ͺ Goods from the domestic country become expensive and goods from foreign countries become cheap, reducing the current account surplus of the domestic country and the deficits of the foreign countries.
(2 of 5)

β€’ Thus, price-specie-flow mechanism of the gold standard could automatically reduce current account surpluses and deficits, achieving a measure of external balance for all countries.

Add (3 of 5)
β€’ The Rules of the Game under the gold standard refer to another adjustment process that was theoretically carried out by central banks:
– The selling of domestic assets to acquire money when gold exited the country as payments for imports. This decreased the money supply and increased interest rates, attracting financial inflows to match a current account deficit.
β–ͺ This reversed or reduced gold outflows.Add
– The buying of domestic assets when gold enters the country as income from exports. This increased the money supply and decreased interest rates, reducing financial inflows to match the current account.
β–ͺ This reversed or reduced gold inflows. (4 of 5)
β€’ Banks with decreasing gold reserves had a strong incentive to practice the rules of the game: they could not redeem currency without sufficient gold. β€’ Banks with increasing gold reserves had a weak incentive to practice the rules of the game: gold did not earn interest, but domestic assets did.
Add
β€’ In practice, central banks with increasing gold reserves seldom followed the rules. β€’ And central banks often sterilized gold flows, trying to prevent any effect on money supplies and prices.
(5 of 5)
β€’ The gold standard’s record for internal balance was mixed. – The United States suffered from deflation, recessions, and financial instability during the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s while trying to adhere to a gold standard.
– The U.S. unemployment rate was 6.8% on average from 1890 to 1913, but it was less than 5.7% on average from 1946 to 1992.Add

Interwar Years: 1918–1939
1944 at
$35.00 per ounce (a devaluation of the dollar).
– The United Kingdom reinstated the gold standard from
1925 to 1931. Add
β€’ But countries that adhered to the gold standard for the longest time, without devaluing their currencies, suffered most from reduced output and employment during the 1930s.
Bretton Woods System: 1944–1973
– a fixed exchange rate against the U.S. dollar and a fixed dollar price of gold ($35 per ounce).
β€’ They also established other institutions:
1. The International Monetary FundAdd
2. The World Bank
3. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT), the predecessor to the World Trade Organization (WTO).
International Monetary Fund (1 of 2)
β€’ The IMF was constructed to lend to countries with persistent balance of payments deficits (or current account deficits), and to approve of devaluations.
– Loans were made from a fund paid for by members in gold and currencies. – Each country had a quota, which determined its contribution to the fund and the maximum amount it could Add borrow.
– Large loans were made conditional on the supervision of domestic policies by the IMF: IMF conditionality. – Devaluations could occur if the IMF determined that the economy was experiencing a β€œfundamental disequilibrium.”
International Monetary Fund (2 of 2)
– The volatility of exchange rates during 1918–1939,
caused by devaluations and the vagaries of the gold standard, was viewed as a source of economic Add instability.
Bretton Woods System (1 of 2)
β€’ In order to avoid sudden changes in the financial account (possibly causing a balance of payments crisis), countries in the Bretton Woods system often prevented flows of financial assets across countries. β€’ Yet they encouraged flows of goods and services because of the view that trade benefits all economies.
Add
– Currencies were gradually made convertible (exchangeable) between member countries to encourage trade in goods and services valued in different currencies.
Bretton Woods System (2 of 2)
β€’ Under a system of fixed exchange rates, all countries but the United States had ineffective monetary policies for internal balance.
β€’ The principal tool for internal balance was fiscal policy (government purchases or taxes).
β€’ The principal tools for external balance were borrowing Add from the IMF, restrictions on financial asset flows, and infrequent changes in exchange rates.
Policies for Internal and External Balance (1 of 4)
β€’ Suppose internal balance in the short run occurs when production is at potential output or when β€œfull employment” equals aggregate demand:
f

Add P
β€’ An increase in government purchases (or a decrease in taxes) increases aggregate demand and output above its full employment level.
β€’ To restore internal balance in the short run, a revaluation (a fall in E) must occur.
Policies for Internal and External Balance (2 of 4)
β€’ Suppose external balance in the short run occurs when the current account achieves some value X:
EP *
CA

β€’ An increase in government purchases (or a decrease in taxes) increases aggregate demand, output and income, decreasing the Add current account.
β€’ To restore external balance in the short run, a devaluation (a rise in E) must occur.
Figure 19.2 Internal Balance (II), External Balance
(XX), and the β€œFour Zones of Economic Discomfort”

The diagram shows what different levels of the exchange rate, E, and overall domestic spending, A, imply for employment and the current account. Along II, output is at its full-employment level, Y f . Along XX, the current account is at its target level, X.
Figure 19.3 Policies to Bring about Internal and
External Balance

Unless the currency is devalued and the level of domestic spending rises, internal and external balance (point 1) cannot be reached. Acting alone, a change in fiscal policy, for example, enables the economy to attain either internal balance (point 3) or external balance (point 4), but only at the cost of increasing the economy’s distance from the goal that is sacrificed.
Policies for Internal and External Balance (3 of 4)
β€’ But under the fixed exchange rates of the Bretton Woods system, devaluations were supposed to be infrequent, and fiscal policy was supposed to be the main policy tool to achieve both internal and external balance. β€’ But in general, fiscal policy cannot attain both internal balance and external balance at the same time.
Add
β€’ A devaluation, however, can attain both internal balance and external balance at the same time.
Policies for Internal and External Balance (4 of 4)
β€’ Under the Bretton Woods system, policy makers generally used fiscal policy to try to achieve internal balance for political reasons. β€’ Thus, an inability to adjust exchange rates left countries facing external imbalances over time.
Add
– Infrequent devaluations or revaluations helped restore external and internal balance, but speculators also tried to anticipate them, which could cause greater internal or external imbalances.

(1 of 3)
β€’ The collapse of the Bretton Woods system was caused primarily by imbalances of the United States during the 1960s and 1970s.
– The U.S. current account surplus became a deficit in
1971.
– Rapidly increasing government purchases increased aggregate demand and output, as well as prices.Add – Rising prices and a growing money supply caused the U.S. dollar to become overvalued in terms of gold and in terms of foreign currencies.
(2 of 3)
β€’ Another problem was that as foreign economies grew, their need for official international reserves to maintain fixed exchange rates grew as well. β€’ But this rate of growth was faster than the growth rate of the gold reserves that central banks held.
– Supply of gold from new discoveries was growing slowly.
– Holding dollar-denominated assets was the alternative.Add
β€’ At some point, dollar-denominated assets held by foreign central banks would be greater than the amount of gold held by the Federal Reserve.
(3 of 3)
β€’ The Federal Reserve would eventually not have enough gold: foreigners would lose confidence in the ability of the Federal Reserve to maintain the fixed price of gold at
$35/ounce, and therefore would rush to redeem their dollar assets before the gold ran out.
– If markets perceive that the central bank does not have enough official international reserve assets to maintain a fixed rate, a balance of payments crisis is inevitable.

(1 of 5)
β€’ The United States was not willing to reduce government purchases or increase taxes significantly, nor reduce money supply growth.
β€’ These policies would have reduced aggregate demand, output, and inflation and increased unemployment. – The United States could have attained some semblance of external balance at a cost of a slower economy.Add
β€’ A devaluation, however, could have avoided the costs of low output and high unemployment and still have attained external balance (an increased current account and official international reserves).
(2 of 5)
β€’ The imbalances of the United States , in turn, caused speculation about the value of the U.S. dollar, which caused imbalances for other countries and made the system of fixed exchange rates harder to maintain.
– Financial markets had the perception that the
U.S. economy was experiencing a β€œfundamental
disequilibrium” and that a devaluation would Add be necessary.
(3 of 5)
– Thereafter, individuals and private institutions were no longer allowed to redeem gold from the Federal Reserve or other central banks. Add – The Federal Reserve would sell only to other central banks at $35/ounce.
(4 of 5)
β€’ Second, speculation about a devaluation of the dollar in terms of other currencies caused investors to buy large quantities of foreign currency assets.
(5 of 5)
β€’ The Bretton Woods system collapsed in 1973 because central banks were unwilling to continue to buy overvalued dollar-denominated assets and to sell undervalued foreign currency–denominated assets.
β€’ In 1973, central banks thought they would temporarily
stop trading in the foreign exchange market and would let exchange rates adjust to supply and demand, and Add then would reimpose fixed exchange rates soon.
β€’ But no new global system of fixed rates was started again.

Table 19.1 Inflation Rates in Industrial Countries,
1966–1972 (Percent Per Year)

Add
Country 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
Britain 3.6 2.6 4.6 5.2 6.5 9.7 6.9
France
Germany
Italy
United
States 2.8
3.4
2.1
2.9 2.8 Ass ignment Project Exam
1.4
Hel4.4 6.5 5.3 5.5 6.2 p
2.1
2.9 1.9 3.4 5.3 5.5
3.1
5.2 5.3
4.2 5.5 5.7 4.4 3.2
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Main Economic Indicators: Historical Statistics, 1964–1983. Paris: OECD, 1984. Figures are percentage increases in each year’s average consumer price index over that of the previous year.
Figure 19.4 Effect on Internal and External Balance of a Rise in the Foreign Price Level, P*

After P* rises, point 1 is in zone 1 (overemployment and an excessive surplus). Revaluation (a fall in E) restores balance immediately by moving the policy setting to point 2.
(1 of 6)
1. Monetary policy autonomy – Without a need to trade currency in foreign exchange markets, central banks are more free to influence the domestic money supply, interest rates, and inflation.
– Central banks can more freely react to changes in aggregate demand, output, and prices in order to Add achieve internal balance.
Case for Floating Exchange Rates (2 of 6)
2. Automatic stabilization – Flexible exchange rates change the prices of a country’s
products and help reduce β€œfundamental disequilibria.”
– One fundamental disequilibrium is caused by an excessive increase in money supply and government purchases, leading to inflation, as we saw in the United States during
1965–1972. Add
– Inflation causes the currency’s purchasing power to fall, both domestically and internationally, and flexible exchange rates can automatically adjust to account for this fall in value, as purchasing power parity predicts. (3 of 6)
– Another fundamental disequilibrium could be caused by a change in aggregate demand for a country’s products.
– Flexible exchange rates would automatically adjust to stabilize high or low aggregate demand and output,

thereby keeping output closer to its normal level and
also stabilizing price changes in the long run. Add
Figure 19.5 Effects of a Fall in Export
Demand

Add
The response to a fall in export demand (seen in the shift from DD DD1 to 2) differs under floating and fixed exchange rates. (a) With a floating rate, output falls only to Y2 as the currency’s depreciation (form E E1 to 2) shifts demand back toward domestic goods. (b) With the exchange rate fixed at E1, output falls all the way to Y 3 as the
central bank reduces the money supply (reflected in the shift from AA AA1 to 2).
(4 of 6)
– In the short run and long run, a real depreciation of domestic products occurs through a nominal depreciation under flexible exchange rates.Add
β€’ Fixed exchange rates cannot survive for long in a world with divergent macroeconomic policies and other changes that affect national aggregate demand and national income differently.

(5 of 6)

– Fixed exchange rates are unsustainable if markets believe that the central bank does not have enough official international reserves.
Add (6 of 6)
4. Symmetry (not possible under Bretton Woods)
– The United States is now allowed to adjust its exchange rate, like other countries. – Other countries are allowed to adjust their money
supplies for macroeconomic goals, like the United
States could. Add
Since 1973 (1 of 6)
β€’ In 1975, IMF members met in Rambouillet, France to allow flexible exchange rates, but to prevent β€œerratic
fluctuations.”
β€’ In 1976 in Kingston, Jamaica, they amended the articles of agreement for IMF membership to formally endorse flexible rates,
Add
– but prevented members from β€œmanipulating exchange rates … to gain an unfair competitive advantage”: no expenditure-switching policies were allowed.
– The articles allowed β€œsurveillance” of members by other members to be sure they were acting fairly.

Since 1973 (2 of 6)
– This contributed to a growing current account deficit by making imports cheaper and U.S. goods more expensive. Add
Inflation (percent per year)
United States
Europe
Japan 3.3
3.9
5.5 8.8
10.1
8.7 ssignment Pr
elp3.8 2.6
5.8 3.1 oject
2.1
2.5 Exam
1.7
1.5 1.2 1.9
0.5 0.5 0.0

Unemployment (percent of labor force) Add
United States 4.7 7.0 6.8 5.3 6.6 7.6 4.2
Europe 1.9 5.5 9.4 10.2 7.9 10.4 7.8
Japan 1.2 1.9 2.5 4.1 4.3 4.2 2.6
Per Capita Real GDP Growth (percent per year)
United States 4.0 2.3 3.5 3.2 ent Proj
Help 0.3negative 0.3
e
2.2 2.2
Europe Blank 2.6 2.5 2.2 negative 0.3
0.3
1.2 2.3
Japan 7.9 3.7 4.0htt ps://p1.1 owco 1.7negative der.co1.5 m 1.1
Source: International Monetary Fund, Eurostat, and World Bank.Add
Figure 19.6 Nominal and Real Effective Dollar
The indexes are measures of the nominal and real value of the U.S. dollar in terms of a basket of foreign currencies. An increase in the indexes is a dollar appreciation; a decrease, a dollar depreciation. For both indexes, the 2005 value is 100.
Source: Bank for International Settlements.
(3 of 6)
β€’ To reduce the value of the US $, the United States, Germany, Japan, Britain, and France announced in 1985 that their central banks would jointly intervene in the foreign exchange markets in order to reduce the value of the dollar. – The dollar dropped sharply the next day and continued to drop as the United States continued a Add more expansionary monetary policy, pushing down interest rates. – The agreement was called the Plaza Accords, because it was announced at the Plaza Hotel in New York. (4 of 6)
β€’ After the value of the dollar fell, countries were interested in stabilizing exchange rates. – United States, Germany, Japan, Britain, France, and
Canada announced renewed cooperation in 1987, pledging to stabilize exchange rates.

– They calculated zones of about 5% around which
current exchange rates were allowed to fluctuate.Add – The agreement was called the Louvre Accords, because it was announced at the Louvre in Paris. (5 of 6)
(6 of 6)
β€’ Many fixed exchange rate systems have nonetheless developed since 1973.
– European monetary system and euro zone (studied in Econ Chapter 21/Finance Chapter 10).
– The Chinese central bank currently fixes the value of its currency.
– ASEAN countries have considered a fixed exchange Add rates and policy coordination.
β€’ No system is right for all countries at all times.
(1 of 5)
β€’ Previously, we assumed that countries are β€œsmall” in that their policies do not affect world markets. – For example, a depreciation of the domestic currency was assumed to have no significant influence on aggregate demand, output, and prices in foreign countries.
β€’ However, large economies such as the United States, EU, Japan, and China are interdependent because policies in one country affect other economies.
(2 of 5)
β€’ If the United States permanently increases the money supply, the DD-AA model predicts for the short run:
1. an increase in U.S. output and income

2. a depreciation of the U.S. dollar β€’ What would be the effects for Japan? 1. an increase in U.S. output and income would raise demand for Japanese products, thereby increasing aggregate demand and output in JapanAdd .
2. a depreciation of the U.S. dollar means an appreciation of the yen, lowering demand for Japanese products, thereby decreasing aggregate demand and output in Japan. – The total effect of (1) and (2) is ambiguous. (3 of 5)
β€’ If the United States permanently increases government purchases, the DD-AA model predicts:
– an appreciation of the U.S. dollar. β€’ What would be the effects for Japan?

– an appreciation of the U.S. dollar means an depreciation of the yen, raising demand for Japanese products, thereby increasing aggregate demand and output in Japan. Add
β€’ What would be the subsequent effects for the United States ?
– Higher Japanese output and income means that more income is spent on U.S. products, increasing aggregate demand and output in the United States in the short run. (4 of 5)
β€’ In fact, the United States has depended on saved funds from many countries, while it has borrowed heavily.
expenditure.
Add

Figure 19.8: Long-Term Real Interest Rates for the United States,

Real interest rates fell to low levels in the 2000s. Many countries followed the same trend.
Source: OECD. Real interest rates are six-month moving averages of monthly nominal interest rates on 10-year government bonds less inflation over the preceding year.
Macroeconomic Interdependence under Floating Exchange Rates (5 of 5)
β€’ But as foreign countries spend more and lend less to the United States,
– interest rates are rising slightly – the U.S. dollar is depreciating
– the U.S. current account is increasing (becoming less negative).
During the first half of the 2000s, the large increase in the U.S. current account deficit was matched by increases in the surpluses of Asian countries (notably China), Latin America, and oil exporters. After 2008 the imbalances shrank temporarily, but have since increased, with the euro area developing a big surplus.
Source: International Monetary Fund,
Figure 19.9 Immediate Output and Fiscal Consequences of the Global Pandemic Crisis
Global output levels declined sharply because of the pandemic lockdown, while governments responded
with fiscal measures even more aggressive than during earlier global financial crisis. Panel (a) shows
indices of the level of GDP. Panel (b) shows aggregate global pubic debt and deficits.
Add
Recent Inflation Rates in Some Advanced
Countries

Over the floating-rate period as a whole, higher
inflation has been associated with greater currency depreciation. The exact relationship predicted by relative PPP, however, has not held for most countries. The
inflation difference on the horizontal axis is calculated as
using the exact relative PPP
Add
relation given in footnote 1 of Chapter 16.
Source: International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics and Global Financial Data.

(1 of 5)
1. Internal balance means that an economy enjoys normal output and employment and price stability.
2. External balance roughly means a stable level of official international reserves or a current account that is not too positive or too negative.
3. The gold standard had two mechanisms that helped to prevent
external imbalances: Add
– Price-specie-flow mechanism: the automatic adjustment of prices as gold flows into or out of a country. – Rules of the game: buying or selling of domestic assets by central banks to influence flows of financial assets.
(2 of 5)
4. The Bretton Woods agreement in 1944 established fixed exchange rates, using the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency.
5. The IMF was also established to provide countries with financing for balance of payments deficits and to judge if changes in fixed rates were necessary.
6. Under the Bretton Woods system, fiscal policies were used to achieve internal and external balance, but they could not do both Add simultaneously, so external imbalances
often resulted.
(3 of 5)
7. Internal and external imbalances of the United States β€”caused by rapid growth in government purchases and the money supplyβ€”and
speculation about the value of the U.S. dollar in terms of gold and other currencies ultimately broke the Bretton Woods system.
8. High inflation from U.S. macroeconomic policies was transferred to other countries late in the Bretton Woods system.
Add (4 of 5)
9. Arguments for flexible exchange rates are that they allow monetary policy autonomy, can stabilize the economy as aggregate demand
and output change, and can limit some forms of speculation.
10. Arguments against flexible exchange rates are that they allow expenditure switching policies, can make aggregate demand and output more volatile because of uncoordinated
policies across countries, and make exchange rates more volatile.
Add
(5 of 5)
11. Since 1973, countries have engaged in two major global efforts to influence exchange rates:
– The Plaza Accords reduced the value of the dollar relative to other major currencies.
– The Louvre Accords agreement was intended to stabilize exchange rates, but it was quickly abandoned.
12. Models of large countries account for the influence that domestic Add macroeconomic policies have in foreign countries.

Figure 19A.1 Hypothetical Effects of Different Monetary Policy Combinations on Inflation and Unemployment

Monetary policy choices in one country affect the outcomes of monetary policy choices made abroad.
Figure 19A.2 Payoff Matrix for Different Monetary
Policy Moves

Each entry equals the reduction in inflation per unit rise in the unemployment rate
Calculated as If each country β€œgoes it alone,” they both choose very
restrictive policies. Somewhat restrictive policies, if adopted by both countries, lead to an outcome better for both.

  • ECON7520-veme1t.zip