Description
Objective:
| ·        The objective of this assignment is to understand Database Administration, and
Database Security. |
Plagiarism Policy:
| ·        This assignment is an individual task. Collaboration of any type amounts to a
violation of the academic integrity policy and will be reported to the AIO. ·        Content cannot be copied verbatim from any source(s). Please understand the concept and write in your own words. In addition, cite the actual source. Failing to do so will be considered as plagiarism and/or cheating. ·        The Dalhousie Academic Integrity policy applies to all material submitted as part of this course. Please understand the policy, which is available at: https : //www. dal. ca/dept/university_s ecretariat/academi c-integrity.html |
Assignment Rubric
| Excellent (25%) | Proficient (15%) | Marginal (5%) | Unacceptable
(0%) |
|
| Completeness
including Citation |
All required tasks
are completed |
Submission highlights
tasks completion. However, missed some tasks in between, which created a disconnection |
Some tasks are
completed, which are disjoint in nature. |
Incorrect and
irrelevant |
| Correctness | All parts of the
given tasks are correct |
Most of the given tasks are
correct However, some portions need minor modifications |
Most of the given
tasks are incorrect. The submission requires major modifications. |
Incorrect and
unacceptable |
| Novelty | The submission
contains novel contribution in key segments, which is a clear indication |
The submission lacks
novel contributions. There are some evidences of novelty, however, it is not significant |
The submission
does not contain novel contributions. However, there is |
There is no
novelty |
| of application
knowledge |
an evidence of
some effort |
|||
| Clarity | The written or | The written or graphical | The written or | Failed to prove |
| graphical | materials and developed | graphical | the clarity. Need | |
| materials, and | applications do not show | materials, and | proper | |
| developed | clear picture of the | developed | background | |
| applications | concept. There is room for | applications fail to | knowledge to | |
| provide a clear
picture of the concept, and highlights the clarity |
improvement | prove the clarity.
Background knowledge is needed |
perform the tasks |
Citation:
McKinney, B. (2018). The impact of program-wide discussion board grading rubrics on students’ and faculty
satisfaction. Online Learning, 22(2), 289-299.
Tasks
- Read the given paper and write summary (Maximum 2 pages in your own words – Do
not copy any content verbatim).
- In addition, explore** and report, if the paper has any scope of improvements in terms
of technical details or concepts.
|
|
** Due to time constraint, and limitation of formal background research, you do not need to
explore any presented scientific equations or parameters in details
Visit and Login to https://dal.ca.libguides.com/ieee and search the following papers.
3 . Do not forget to provide citation in proper format for the given paper and for any other
supporting materials that you may use as reference.
Database Administration and Security Reading
H . Yais h and M . G oyal, ” Multi-tenant Database Access Control,” 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference
on Computational Science and Engineering, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2013, pp. 870-877, doi:
10.1109/CSE.2013.131.
Paper Link: https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/document/6755311
Assignment 5 Submission Format:
Submit one single P D F file
